Long v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Long v. State

803 So. 2d 913, 2002 WL 80941

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 28, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-2496

StatusPublished

This text of 803 So. 2d 913 (Long v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Long v. State, 803 So. 2d 913, 2002 WL 80941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant Rubin Long a/k/a Olusequn B. Falodun’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following opinion.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying post-conviction relief. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

Affirmed; question certified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI