Long v. State
803 So. 2d 913, 2002 WL 80941
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant Rubin Long a/k/a Olusequn B. Falodun’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following opinion.
We affirm the trial court’s order denying post-conviction relief. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Affirmed; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Long v. State, 803 So. 2d 913, 2002 WL 80941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
803 So. 2d 913 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Major v. State
790 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)