Long v. State

267 So. 2d 46, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6075
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 1972·No. No. Q-368·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to [47] demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Rumph v. State (Fla.App. 1971), 248 So.2d 526; Footman v. State (Fla.App.1967), 203 So.2d 356.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. State, 267 So. 2d 46, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

267 So. 2d 46 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rumph v. State
248 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Footman v. State
203 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)