Long v. State
267 So. 2d 46, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6075
This text of 267 So. 2d 46 (Long v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Long v. State, 267 So. 2d 46, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to [47]*47demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Rumph v. State (Fla.App. 1971), 248 So.2d 526; Footman v. State (Fla.App.1967), 203 So.2d 356.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rumph v. State
248 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Footman v. State
203 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
267 So. 2d 46, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.