Long v. State

139 So. 188, 104 Fla. 175
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 2, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is" hereby affirmed.

Buford, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. State, 139 So. 188, 104 Fla. 175 (Fla. 1932).

139 So. 188 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.