Long v. State

60 So. 2d 302, 36 Ala. App. 503, 1952 Ala. App. LEXIS 319
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Long v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ala. App. 164
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided August 5, 1952·No. 5 Div. 366·Published

Opinion

PRICE, Judge.

• The appellant Was convicted of a violation of Section 275, Title 14, Code of 1940, entitled “Carrying on or representing lottery; selling tickets in same.”

The testimony for the State was to tihe effect that defendant had become surety on the appearance and appeal bonds of five persons charged with possession of papers [504]*504or memoranda customarily used in the operation of a lottery in violation of a city ordinance.

Defendant introduced no testimony.

After a careful consideration of the facts adduced in this case, the court is of the opinion there it not sufficient legal evidence connecting the defendant with the commission of the offense charged to authorize a conviction, and that the requested general affirmative charge should have been given.

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. State, 60 So. 2d 302, 36 Ala. App. 503, 1952 Ala. App. LEXIS 319 (Ala. Ct. App. 1952).

60 So. 2d 302 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.