Long v. Riggenbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Long v. Riggenbach

157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 23, 1952

DocketNo. 32853

StatusPublished

This text of 157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395 (Long v. Riggenbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Long v. Riggenbach, 157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395 (Ohio 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record disclosing no abuse of discretion in vacating and setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Lawrence v. Moore, 156 Ohio St., 375, 102 N. E. (2d), 595.

Judgment reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taet, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record disclosing no abuse of discretion in vacating and setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Lawrence v. Moore, 156 Ohio St., 375, 102 N. E. (2d), 595.

Judgment reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taet, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-riggenbach-ohio-1952.