Long v. Riggenbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Long v. Riggenbach

157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 1952·No. No. 32853·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record disclosing no abuse of discretion in vacating and setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Lawrence v. Moore, 156 Ohio St., 375, 102 N. E. (2d), 595.

Judgment reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taet, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record disclosing no abuse of discretion in vacating and setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Lawrence v. Moore, 156 Ohio St., 375, 102 N. E. (2d), 595.

Judgment reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taet, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Long v. Riggenbach, 157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395 (Ohio 1952).

Pincite

157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395 (Long v. Riggenbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.