Long v. . Rhymes

6 N.C. 122
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 N.C. 122 (Long v. . Rhymes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. . Rhymes, 6 N.C. 122 (N.C. 1812).

Opinion

Tayuoii, Chief-Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

By the law of this State, no one has a right to the guardianship of an infant, except as testamentary guardian, or as appointed by the fattier by deed, or by a County or Superior Court. The act of 1762, regulates this subject in such a manner as to render unnecessary a reference to any prior rule. It is a subject of sound discretion with the Court making the appointment, which another will not annul without perceiving that injury is likely to result from it to the person or estate of the orphan. Neither of these parties can be said to have a right to the guardianship $ but as Rhymes has been appointed, and there is no imputation agjainst his character or conduct, nothing shewn to the Court inducing a belief that he may or will mismanage the estate, we must presume that the County Court has decided rightly. The appointment of Rhymes must therefore be confirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Bidstrup
285 S.E.2d 304 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.C. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-rhymes-nc-1812.