Long v. Oneale
This text of 15 F. Cas. 828 (Long v. Oneale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
was of opinion that the instruction prayed by Mr. Key ought to be given; but KILTY, Chief Judge, being of a different opinion, and FITZ-HUGH, Circuit Judge, being absent, the instruction was not given.
The defendant took a bill of exceptions, and upon a writ of error, the judgment was reversed by the supreme court ef the United States. See 4 Cranch [8 U. S.] 60.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 F. Cas. 828, 1 Cranch 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-oneale-circtddc-1804.