Long v. Morrow

95 A. 393, 250 Pa. 94
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 26, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 388·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order directing judgment to be entered on a bond more than twenty years old. The circumstances under which the appellant gave it are concisely stated in the opinion of the court ordering the [98]*98judgment to be entered. If the bond had not been more than twenty years old, the right of the appellee would have been to enter judgment on it without an order of the court permitting her to do so; and nothing appeared in the answer of the appellant to the petition for leave to enter the judgment which would have justified the court’s denial of the order prayed for. For what amount, if any, the appellant may be actually liable on the judgment can be determined only after the Orphans’ Court has made a decree distributing the estate of her father. If she has not received more than a child’s share •in it, there will be no liability on the judgment.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. Morrow, 95 A. 393, 250 Pa. 94 (Pa. 1915).

95 A. 393 (Long v. Morrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long's Estate
98 A. 1066 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)