Long v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Long v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co.

25 Misc. 764

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Misc. 764 (Long v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Long v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 25 Misc. 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question submitted by the appellant upon this appeal is one concerning the constitutionality of the statute under which the Municipal Court of the city of New York has been established. As this court has passed upon the question adversely to the contention of the appellant in the case of Irwin v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 25 Misc. Rep. 187, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gtldersleeve and Gtegerioh, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only question submitted by the appellant upon this appeal is one concerning the constitutionality of the statute under which the Municipal Court of the city of New York has been established. As this court has passed upon the question adversely to the contention of the appellant in the case of Irwin v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 25 Misc. Rep. 187, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gtldersleeve and Gtegerioh, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Misc. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-metropolitan-street-ry-co-nyappterm-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack