Long v. . Mason
This text of 84 N.C. 15 (Long v. . Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An alteration of a bond in a material part by a party to it, vacates the same, except as to parties consenting thereto. Davis v. Coleman, 7 Ired., 424; Draper v. Wood, 112 Mass., 315. An addition of the words “ interest at six per cent,” written in a corner of the.bond after it had been signed, is an alteration of it in a material particular. *17 ■'3 Addison -on Contracts,-§ 1-280. Tire in'tent 'with which the alteration is ma.de seems according to the weight of -authorities to be immaterial-; but however that may be, it has been decided by this -court in Dunn v. Clements, 7 Jones 58, that whenever -a -material alteration'has -been made,-a lpresumption -of fra'ud arises, and remains '-until -rebutted. There was no-evidence offered on the trial to remove this ¡presumption.
We therefore‘concur with His -Honor in the -opinion that %he defendant was entitled to .judgment.
-No error. -Affirmed-. '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 N.C. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-mason-nc-1881.