Long v. M & M Transportation, LLC

603 F. App'x 238
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 2015
DocketNo. 14-2004
StatusPublished

This text of 603 F. App'x 238 (Long v. M & M Transportation, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. M & M Transportation, LLC, 603 F. App'x 238 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Tyler Long, Christopher Emmett Long, and Edy Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for partial summary judgment and granting Appellees’ revised motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Long v. M & M Transp., LLC, 44 F.Supp.3d 636 (N.D.W.Va.2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. M & M Transportation, LLC
44 F. Supp. 3d 636 (N.D. West Virginia, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 F. App'x 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-m-m-transportation-llc-ca4-2015.