Long v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Long v. Long

240 A.D. 977

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 977 (Long v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Long v. Long, 240 A.D. 977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff on new findings to be made, without costs. Finding of fact number 4 is reversed as against the weight of evidence, and conclusion of law number 1 is disapproved. This court finds plaintiff’s requests numbers 4 and 5 and conclusions of law numbers 1 and 2, and directs judgment for the plaintiff. Any further findings and the order may be settled on notice. Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., concur for reversal and vote for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff on new findings to be made, without costs. Finding of fact number 4 is reversed as against the weight of evidence, and conclusion of law number 1 is disapproved. This court finds plaintiff’s requests numbers 4 and 5 and conclusions of law numbers 1 and 2, and directs judgment for the plaintiff. Any further findings and the order may be settled on notice. Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., concur for reversal and vote for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-long-nyappdiv-1933.