Long v. Kingsfield
This text of 216 S.E.2d 904 (Long v. Kingsfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under that which was held in Sale v. Leachman, 218 Ga. 834 (131 SE2d 185), where the father has made a payment for the support of his child within the twelve-month period immediately preceding the filing of a petition to adopt the child, and, as here, the evidence authorized a finding that he has not "wantonly and wilfully” failed to comply for said period with the terms of the support decree, it cannot be said that he wilfully failed to comply with a court order to support the child and thereby waived the requirement of his consent for the adoption of the child. Code Ann. § 74-403 (2) (Ga. L. 1941, pp. 300, 301; 1950, pp. 289, 290; 1957, p. 367; 1960, pp. 791, 792; 1967, pp. 107, 108).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 S.E.2d 904, 135 Ga. App. 23, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-kingsfield-gactapp-1975.