Long v. Kentucky State Penitentiary

894 F.2d 1336, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1226, 1990 WL 6889
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 1990
Docket89-5932
StatusUnpublished

This text of 894 F.2d 1336 (Long v. Kentucky State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. Kentucky State Penitentiary, 894 F.2d 1336, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1226, 1990 WL 6889 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

894 F.2d 1336

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Michael Wayne LONG, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
KENTUCKY STATE PENITENTIARY; Kentucky State Reformatory;
Luther Luckett Correctional Complex; David H. Bland;
Department of Corrections; Kentucky Correctional
Psychiatric Center; G.H. Freeman; Doris Gregory; Warren
County Jail; Governor Wallace Wilkinson;, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-5932.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1990.

Before WELLFORD and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges, and THOMAS G. HULL, Chief District Judge.*

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the brief and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Plaintiff Long, a Kentucky prisoner, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages for various claimed constitutional deprivations. The district court ultimately dismissed the case and this appeal followed. Plaintiff has submitted a brief in his own behalf.

Upon consideration, we find that the district court properly dismissed the case at bar. Long's complaint is a rambling narrative of prior litigation (Kendrick v. Bland, 541 F.Supp. 21 (W.D.Ky.1981)), as well as conclusory allegations of eighth amendment violations. Vague, conclusory allegations of unconstitutional conduct will not support a civil rights claim. Gutierrez v. Lynch, 826 F.2d 1534, 1538-39 (6th Cir.1987).

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Thomas G. Hull, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kendrick v. Bland
541 F. Supp. 21 (W.D. Kentucky, 1981)
Gutierrez v. Lynch
826 F.2d 1534 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 F.2d 1336, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1226, 1990 WL 6889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-kentucky-state-penitentiary-ca6-1990.