Long v. Jones

122 Ala. 659
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1898·Published

Opinion

[660]*660Opinion by

Tyson, J.

[659]*659The appeal in this case is from a judgment of the trial court overruling a motion for a new trial made by the appellant, who was the claimant in a statutory trial of the right of property. It is held by the court that the evidence offered in support of the motion for a new trial does not come up to the requirement of the rule as to the diligence required of the claimant in making her defense to the claim suit, and on the authority of Waddill v. Weaver, 53 Ala. 58, and National Fertilizer Co. [660]*660v. Hinson, 103 Ala. 536, and authorities therein cited, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. Jones, 122 Ala. 659 (Ala. 1898).

122 Ala. 659 (Long v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waddill v. Weaver
53 Ala. 58 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
National Fertilize Co. v. Hinson
103 Ala. 532 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)