Long v. Hoedle
119 P. 484, 60 Or. 377, 1911 Ore. LEXIS 240
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Where the execution of a note is denied, there is no presumption in favor of the fairness or regularity of the transaction, and the instruction given was misleading and erroneous. Sears v. Daly, 43 Or. 346 (73 Pac. 5), and cases there cited.
No error appears in other rulings made and excepted to on the trial.
The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Long v. Hoedle, 119 P. 484, 60 Or. 377, 1911 Ore. LEXIS 240 (Or. 1911).
119 P. 484 (Long v. Hoedle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirchner v. Clostermann
299 P. 995 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)
Cady v. Bay City Land Co.
201 P. 179 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)