Long v. Hoedle
119 P. 484, 60 Or. 377, 1911 Ore. LEXIS 240
This text of 119 P. 484 (Long v. Hoedle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Long v. Hoedle, 119 P. 484, 60 Or. 377, 1911 Ore. LEXIS 240 (Or. 1911).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Where the execution of a note is denied, there is no presumption in favor of the fairness or regularity of the transaction, and the instruction given was misleading and erroneous. Sears v. Daly, 43 Or. 346 (73 Pac. 5), and cases there cited.
No error appears in other rulings made and excepted to on the trial.
The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kirchner v. Clostermann
299 P. 995 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)
Cady v. Bay City Land Co.
201 P. 179 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 P. 484, 60 Or. 377, 1911 Ore. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-hoedle-or-1911.