Long v. Hitchcock

3 Ohio 274
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Ohio 274 (Long v. Hitchcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. Hitchcock, 3 Ohio 274 (Ohio 1827).

Opinion

By the Court :

The cases cited in support of the motion are not applicable. 'There is no similarity between the appeals to which they refer, [259]*259and the appeal given by our statute. The defendant in this case had perfected his appeal before his *death. When that was done the verdict and judgment were vacated, and the cause was ' considered as transferred to this court, for trial on its merits. The death of the party under these circumstances produced the same effect as if the verdict had been set aside, on motion in the court* below, and a new trial granted; in which case there is no doubt but that the suit must have abated by the subsequent death of the defendant. If the defendant had died after the notice, and before the appeal was perfected; or if the appeal had been irregularly taken, the verdict and judgment would have remained in force, and if a transcript in such case had been sent here the motion might have been proper. But the case now stands as if there had been no trial, and as the cause of action does not survive at common law, and is not saved by the statute to prevent the abatement of suits, the motion can not be granted.

Suit abated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Village of Oakwood v. Makar
463 N.E.2d 61 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ohio 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-hitchcock-ohio-1827.