Long v. Hinkle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7518

RONALD D. LONG, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE M. HINKLE, Chief, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-05-374-GBL)

Submitted: February 21, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Long, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronald D. Long, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his action filed under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000),* and the order denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Long v. Hinkle, No. CA-05-374-GBL (E.D. Va.

June 20, 2005; filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We

deny Long’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* This order is a final, appealable order over which we have jurisdiction. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 344-45 (4th Cir. 2005).

- 2 -