Long v. Henry
This text of 113 N.W. 1134 (Long v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent, claiming to have procured a purchaser for property belonging to the appellant, brought his action to recover a commission, and secured a verdict. The defendant appealed from an order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
The only question involved, and submitted to the jury by the trial court, was: [515]*515whether the person procured as a purchaser was a bona fide bidder who was ready and willing to make his bid good. The evidence sustains the finding of the jury on this issue. The other questions raised by the assignments of error have been fully considered and found without merit. The order appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 N.W. 1134, 102 Minn. 514, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-henry-minn-1907.