Long v. Harrison
36 S.E. 925, 111 Ga. 884, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 888
Opinion
This case was submitted to the trial judge for decision without a jury. The bill of exceptions recites that “ he rendered a decision against plaintiff,” and that “to said judgment and decision plaintiff in error herein excepts and now assigns the same as error.” Save as above indicated, there was no attempt to assign error. It follows that the writ-of error must be dismissed for want of a specific assignment of error. See Collins v. Carr, ante, 867, and cases cited.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Long v. Harrison, 36 S.E. 925, 111 Ga. 884, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 888 (Ga. 1900).
36 S.E. 925 (Long v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Neal Loan & Banking Co. v. Wright
42 S.E. 715 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
City of Fitzgerald v. Merchants & Planters Bank
39 S.E. 479 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)