Long v. Harrison
This text of 36 S.E. 925 (Long v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was submitted to the trial judge for decision without a jury. The bill of exceptions recites that “ he rendered a decision against plaintiff,” and that “to said judgment and decision plaintiff in error herein excepts and now assigns the same as error.” Save as above indicated, there was no attempt to assign error. It follows that the writ-of error must be dismissed for want of a specific assignment of error. See Collins v. Carr, ante, 867, and cases cited.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 S.E. 925, 111 Ga. 884, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-harrison-ga-1900.