Long v. Harrison

36 S.E. 925, 111 Ga. 884, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 888
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 9, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 925 (Long v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. Harrison, 36 S.E. 925, 111 Ga. 884, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 888 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

This case was submitted to the trial judge for decision without a jury. The bill of exceptions recites that “ he rendered a decision against plaintiff,” and that “to said judgment and decision plaintiff in error herein excepts and now assigns the same as error.” Save as above indicated, there was no attempt to assign error. It follows that the writ-of error must be dismissed for want of a specific assignment of error. See Collins v. Carr, ante, 867, and cases cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neal Loan & Banking Co. v. Wright
42 S.E. 715 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
City of Fitzgerald v. Merchants & Planters Bank
39 S.E. 479 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 925, 111 Ga. 884, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-harrison-ga-1900.