Long v. Harris

473 F.2d 1387
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1973
DocketNos. 72-1021 to 72-1023
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 473 F.2d 1387 (Long v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. Harris, 473 F.2d 1387 (10th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon docketing in this court, this case was assigned to the summary calendar. Thereafter, an attorney who participated in the four day evidentiary hearing conducted in the district court was appointed to assist the appellants. A transcript of the evidentiary hearing where the appellants all testified and were afforded complete opportunity to support their claims was obtained, and the appointed attorney thereafter submitted a memorandum in opposition to summary affirmance addressing the underlying merits.

We have now carefully and thoroughly reviewed the complete record on appeal, including the transcript, and the memorandum in opposition to summary af-firmance. We are convinced that the findings made by the district court at the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing are amply supported by the record. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, reported at 332 F.Supp. 262 (D.C.Kan.1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sconiers v. Jarvis
458 F. Supp. 37 (D. Kansas, 1978)
Hodges v. Klein
421 F. Supp. 1224 (D. New Jersey, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F.2d 1387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-harris-ca10-1973.