Long v. Fields

104 N.C. 221
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Avery, J.

— after stating the facts as above: It has been settled by a line of decisions in this Court, and manifestly upon mature consideration, that, where there is a warranty of soundness in the sale of a horse, the vendee may declare [224] in tort for a false warranty and add a count in deceit, or, under the new procedure, a second cause of action in the nature of deceit, and though the sum demanded be less than two hundred dollars, the aciion will not be deemed one founded on. contract, and the Superior Court will have jurisdiction. Bullinger v. Marshall, 70 N. C., 520; Ashe v. Gray, 88 N. C., 190; Ibid (rehearing), 90 N. C., 137; Harvey v. Hambright, 98 N. C., 446.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. Fields, 104 N.C. 221 (N.C. 1889).

104 N.C. 221 (Long v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. . Snider
8 S.E.2d 202 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Fields v. . Brown
76 S.E. 8 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Bowers v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
12 S.E. 452 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)