Long v. DVA

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 2023
Docket23-2406
StatusUnpublished

This text of Long v. DVA (Long v. DVA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. DVA, (Fed. Cir. 2023).

Opinion

Case: 23-2406 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 11/07/2023

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PAMELA LONG, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent ______________________

2023-2406 ______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in Nos. CH-1221-18-0286-C-1 and CH-1221-18- 0286-W-1. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________

Before LOURIE, MAYER, and STARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) moves to dismiss the petition for review as untimely. Pamela Long has since filed her opening brief but has not responded to the motion. We grant the motion and dismiss. Case: 23-2406 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 11/07/2023

On September 18, 2023, this court received Ms. Long’s petition seeking review of the July 13, 2023, final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A), “a petition to review a final order or final decision of the Board . . . shall be filed within 60 days after the Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the Board.” This timeliness requirement is jurisdictional, which “precludes equitable exceptions.” Fedora v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 848 F.3d 1013, 1016 (Fed. Cir. 2017); cf. Fed. R. App. P. 26(b)(2) (prohibiting this court from extending or reopening the time to file the petition for review “unless specifically authorized by law”). Because this petition was not filed within the 60-day statutory deadline, we dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss is granted. The petition for review is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. (3) All other pending motions are denied as moot. FOR THE COURT

November 7, 2023 Date

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fedora v. Merit Systems Protection Board
848 F.3d 1013 (Federal Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Long v. DVA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-dva-cafc-2023.