Long v. Department of Correctional Services

252 A.D.2d 698, 675 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8161
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 9, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 698 (Long v. Department of Correctional Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. Department of Correctional Services, 252 A.D.2d 698, 675 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from smuggling, attempting to smuggle or soliciting others to smuggle any item into or out of the prison facility. The evidence adduced at petitioner’s disciplinary hearing included the misbehavior report, which indicated that a woman who was visiting petitioner surrendered a balloon containing 20 glassines of heroin to correction officers and stated that petitioner solicited her to smuggle the drugs into him. In our view, the detailed misbehavior report, together with the corroborating testimony of the correction officer who arrested the visitor, provided substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, e.g., Matter of McCleary v Mitchell, 188 AD2d 728). Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, the fact that he did not possess, control or personally smuggle the heroin is irrelevant as the evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that he solicited the woman to smuggle the heroin into the facility. We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Crew III, J. P., White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reyes v. Selsky
32 A.D.3d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Vasile v. Selsky
20 A.D.3d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Watkins v. Goord
307 A.D.2d 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Sartori v. Selsky
297 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Minton v. Goord
263 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 698, 675 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-department-of-correctional-services-nyappdiv-1998.