Long v. Bogaert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Long v. Bogaert

471 So. 2d 680, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1661, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14118

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 3, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1673

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 471 So. 2d 680 (Long v. Bogaert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Long v. Bogaert, 471 So. 2d 680, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1661, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14118 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants raise two issues in this appeal from a judgment for compensatory and punitive damages in an action for malicious prosecution and defamation.

The first issue raised was whether a judicial finding of probable cause after ap-[681]*681pellee’s arrest foreclosed an action for malicious prosecution. This issue was not before the trial court on the motion for directed verdict and, therefore, has not been preserved for appeal. Without commentary on its effect, we note that the issue, as stated, misstates the fact. The judicial probable cause determination relied on by appellants was made prior to appellee’s arrest and not in an adversarial hearing after her arrest.

The second issue raised by appellants concerns the burden of proof to establish defamation. We do not reach that issue as the verdict for compensatory and punitive damages was not divided between the malicious prosecution count and the defamation count. We, therefore, cannot determine upon which count the damages were assessed. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Scarbrough, 355 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1978).

Affirmed.

RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants raise two issues in this appeal from a judgment for compensatory and punitive damages in an action for malicious prosecution and defamation.

The first issue raised was whether a judicial finding of probable cause after ap-[681]*681pellee’s arrest foreclosed an action for malicious prosecution. This issue was not before the trial court on the motion for directed verdict and, therefore, has not been preserved for appeal. Without commentary on its effect, we note that the issue, as stated, misstates the fact. The judicial probable cause determination relied on by appellants was made prior to appellee’s arrest and not in an adversarial hearing after her arrest.

The second issue raised by appellants concerns the burden of proof to establish defamation. We do not reach that issue as the verdict for compensatory and punitive damages was not divided between the malicious prosecution count and the defamation count. We, therefore, cannot determine upon which count the damages were assessed. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Scarbrough, 355 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1978).

Affirmed.

RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 So. 2d 680, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1661, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-bogaert-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack