Long Realty Co. v. Breedin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Long Realty Co. v. Breedin

179 S.E. 47, 175 S.C. 233, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 98

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 8, 1935

Docket14014

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 179 S.E. 47 (Long Realty Co. v. Breedin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Long Realty Co. v. Breedin, 179 S.E. 47, 175 S.C. 233, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 98 (S.C. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

Under the admitted facts of this case, we think that Judge Greene correctly disposed of the appellant’s contentions, and we approve the result of his decree.

Counsel for the defendant asks that the Court overrule the decision in Danielson v. Mixon, 109 S. C., 264, 95 S. *254 E., 515, upon which the respondent relies in part to show that the transaction in the case at bar was not usurious. A study of that decision, however, does not disclose any good reason, even if it should be conceded that the holdings of the Court are not stated as clearly as they might be, to grant the request made.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Let the master’s report and the Court’s order be incorporated in the report of the case.

Messrs. Justices Carter and Bonham and Messrs. Circuit Judges E. C. Dennis and C. J. Ramage, Acting Associate Justices, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI