Long, Luther Ben

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 20, 2012
DocketWR-77,715-01
StatusPublished

This text of Long, Luther Ben (Long, Luther Ben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long, Luther Ben, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-77,715-01

LUTHER BEN LONG, Relator



v.



HON. MOLLEE WESTFALL, JUDGE OF THE 371st DISTRICT COURT, Respondent



ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NOS. C-371-009194-1040300-A AND C-71-009194-1040360-A
FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications (1) for writs of habeas corpus in the 371st District Court of Tarrant County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the applications have not yet been forwarded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court entered an order designating issues on December 3, 2010.

Respondent, the Judge of the 371st District Court of Tarrant County, shall file a response with this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus applications. In the alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order designating issues and then have the District Clerk submit the record on such applications. In either case, Respondent's answer shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted her response.



Filed: June 20, 2012

Do not publish

1. Relator apparently filed a single application challenging two convictions, which were tried and appealed together. Relator believed that he was litigating both convictions, but the District Clerk filed the application in only one cause number. Filing a single application challenging multiple convictions may render the application subject to dismissal under Tex. R. App. P. 73.1. However, the District Clerk in this instance marked out Cause No. 1040360 on the application, rendering the application compliant as to Cause No. 1040300. In the interest of fairness, the District Clerk may duplicate Relator's application, mark out Cause No. 1040300, and consider both applications as if they were received and filed on the same date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Long, Luther Ben, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-luther-ben-texcrimapp-2012.