Long Island Savings Bank v. Pearl Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Long Island Savings Bank v. Pearl Realty Co.

33 A.D.2d 1025, 308 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5622

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 1025 (Long Island Savings Bank v. Pearl Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Long Island Savings Bank v. Pearl Realty Co., 33 A.D.2d 1025, 308 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5622 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a real property mortgage, defendant Pearl Realty Co. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 3, 1967, approving the receiver’s account, as awarded the receiver’s attorney a fee of $3,500. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the award of the fee to the receiver’s attorney to $2,000. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the amount of the award of the attorney’s fee was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a real property mortgage, defendant Pearl Realty Co. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 3, 1967, approving the receiver’s account, as awarded the receiver’s attorney a fee of $3,500. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the award of the fee to the receiver’s attorney to $2,000. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the amount of the award of the attorney’s fee was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 1025, 308 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-island-savings-bank-v-pearl-realty-co-nyappdiv-1970.