Long Island Roller Rebels v. County of Nassau

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

LONG ISLAND ROLLER REBELS, 24-CV-2721 (ARR) (LGD) Plaintiff, NOT FOR ELECTRONIC -against- OR PRINT PUBLICATION

BRUCE BLAKEMAN in his official capacity as NASSAU OPINION & ORDER COUNTY EXECUTIVE, and COUNTY OF NASSAU,

Defendants.

ROSS, United States District Judge:

I have received the Report and Recommendation dated October 24, 2024, from the Honorable Lee G. Dunst. ECF No. 16. No objections have been filed. Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to recover costs incurred “as a result of the removal,” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), is granted. Plaintiff is awarded $11,183.95 for attorney’s fees and costs associated with litigating the motion to remand. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED.

/s/ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge

Dated: November 8, 2024 Brooklyn, New York