Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. Town of Islip

286 A.D.2d 683, 729 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8479

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 10, 2001·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Islip, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered March 8, 2000, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding for failure to timely join the landowner as a necessary party (see, Matter of Artrip v Incorporated Vil. of Piermont, 267 AD2d 457; see also, Matter of Saunders v Graboski, 282 AD2d 610; [684]*684Matter of Save Our-Open Space v Planning Bd., 256 AD2d 581; Matter of Kam Hampton I Realty Corp. v Zagata, 251 AD2d 665).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit (see, Serrone v Jamaica Hosp., 239 AD2d 485). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Smith and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Islip, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered March 8, 2000, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding for failure to timely join the landowner as a necessary party (see, Matter of Artrip v Incorporated Vil. of Piermont, 267 AD2d 457; see also, Matter of Saunders v Graboski, 282 AD2d 610; [684]*684Matter of Save Our-Open Space v Planning Bd., 256 AD2d 581; Matter of Kam Hampton I Realty Corp. v Zagata, 251 AD2d 665).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit (see, Serrone v Jamaica Hosp., 239 AD2d 485). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Smith and Crane, JJ., concur.

Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. Town of Islip, 286 A.D.2d 683, 729 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

286 A.D.2d 683 (Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. Town of Islip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related