Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. Supervisor of Southampton

301 A.D.2d 528, 753 N.Y.S.2d 734, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 208
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 301 A.D.2d 528 (Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. Supervisor of Southampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. Supervisor of Southampton, 301 A.D.2d 528, 753 N.Y.S.2d 734, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Planning Board of the Town of Southampton dated March 29, 2001, granting site-plan approval to the respondent Bridgehampton Road Races Corp., and numerous other determinations of the respondent municipalities granting sundry approvals to developments in Suffolk County, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered December 6, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding on the ground, inter alia, of lack of standing.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The individual petitioners did not meet their burden of establishing their standing to sue. They failed to indicate how the proposed land uses would cause them an injury in fact, different from that suffered by the public at large, within the zone of interest that the State Environmental Quality Review Act (see ECL art 8) is intended to protect (see Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761, 773-774; Matter of Rediker v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Philipstown, 280 AD2d 548; Matter of Long Is. Pine Barrens Socy. v Planning Bd. of Town of Brookhaven, 213 AD2d 484). The organizational [529]*529petitioners similarly lack standing, since they failed to demonstrate that one or more of their individual members would have standing to sue (see Matter of Long Is. Pine Barrens Socy. v Town of Brookhaven, supra).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Hancher v. Travis
2003 NY Slip Op 51483(U) (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Benson v. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corp. Merit Board
305 A.D.2d 1056 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 A.D.2d 528, 753 N.Y.S.2d 734, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-island-pine-barrens-society-inc-v-supervisor-of-southampton-nyappdiv-2003.