Long Island Lighting Co. v. Incorporated Village of East Rockaway
112 N.E.2d 851, 305 N.Y. 738, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1268
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements. A variance was properly refused {Matter of Otto v. Steinhilber, 282 N. Y. 71). The ordinance could not be declared invalid by the Court of Appeals since, on this record, it could not be said as matter of law that location of a substation at the proposed site rather than in the nearby industrial district was necessary for the rendition of safe, adequate and reasonable service. [See 304 N. Y. 932.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Long Island Lighting Co. v. Incorporated Village of East Rockaway, 112 N.E.2d 851, 305 N.Y. 738, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1268 (N.Y. 1953).
112 N.E.2d 851 (Long Island Lighting Co. v. Incorporated Village of East Rockaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. McCabe
32 Misc. 2d 898 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City of Fulton
8 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)