Long Island Lighting Co. v. Ambro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Long Island Lighting Co. v. Ambro

40 A.D.2d 994, 338 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 994 (Long Island Lighting Co. v. Ambro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Long Island Lighting Co. v. Ambro, 40 A.D.2d 994, 338 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul respondents’ determination dated June 20, 1972, denying petitioner’s applications for approval of site and building plans for an electric generating unit, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 8, 1972, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding pursuant to subdivision 1 of CPLR 7801 on the ground that respondents’ determination was not final. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remanded to Special Term to proceed expeditiously in accordance with the views herein set forth. Although respondents’ determination was not final, because it denied petitioner’s applications pending submission of additional information, in our opinion it was reviewable (CPLR 7801, subd. 1; Town Law, § 267, subd. 7; Ellsworth Realty Co. v. Kramer, 268 App. Div. 824; Matter of Peckham Ind. v. Ross, 60 Misc 2d 566, affd. on other grounds 34 A D 2d 826). However, further proceedings at Special Term are required to resolve the dispute evidenced in the papers before this court over whether information not placed before respondents is pertinent to their decision and capable of being acquired., Respondents’ return should be filed at once; and the proceeding set down for a preferred and speedy trial, with the right to the losing party to seek a quick appeal. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul respondents’ determination dated June 20, 1972, denying petitioner’s applications for approval of site and building plans for an electric generating unit, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 8, 1972, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding pursuant to subdivision 1 of CPLR 7801 on the ground that respondents’ determination was not final. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remanded to Special Term to proceed expeditiously in accordance with the views herein set forth. Although respondents’ determination was not final, because it denied petitioner’s applications pending submission of additional information, in our opinion it was reviewable (CPLR 7801, subd. 1; Town Law, § 267, subd. 7; Ellsworth Realty Co. v. Kramer, 268 App. Div. 824; Matter of Peckham Ind. v. Ross, 60 Misc 2d 566, affd. on other grounds 34 A D 2d 826). However, further proceedings at Special Term are required to resolve the dispute evidenced in the papers before this court over whether information not placed before respondents is pertinent to their decision and capable of being acquired., Respondents’ return should be filed at once; and the proceeding set down for a preferred and speedy trial, with the right to the losing party to seek a quick appeal. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 994, 338 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-island-lighting-co-v-ambro-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack