Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

101 A. 367, 90 N.J.L. 701, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 409
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 24, 1917·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Legal questions were first dealt with in the opinion of Mr. Justice Parker in the court below, so as to lay a foundation for the consideration of the facts, and those questions were, in our opinion, rightly decided. As there was evidence to support the finding of facts made by the Supreme Court, that finding is not reviewahle-in this court.

The judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, Heppbniteimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment, 101 A. 367, 90 N.J.L. 701, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 409 (N.J. 1917).

101 A. 367 (Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority v. Cariddi
417 A.2d 529 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)
Main Associates, Inc. v. B. & R. ENTERPRISES, INC
181 A.2d 541 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Stack v. Hoboken
132 A.2d 314 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
D., L. & WR CO. v. City of Hoboken
85 A.2d 200 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)