Loney v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Loney v. United States

623 F. App'x 78

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2015·No. No. 15-6601·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kirk L. Loney appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Loney v. United States, No. 3:11-cv-00845-REP, 2015 WL 731633 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 18, 2015; entered Feb. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kirk L. Loney appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Loney v. United States, No. 3:11-cv-00845-REP, 2015 WL 731633 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 18, 2015; entered Feb. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Loney v. United States, 623 F. App'x 78 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

623 F. App'x 78 (Loney v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related