Lonergan v. State

720 So. 2d 319, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14691, 1998 WL 796709
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 1998
DocketNo. 98-1203
StatusPublished

This text of 720 So. 2d 319 (Lonergan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lonergan v. State, 720 So. 2d 319, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14691, 1998 WL 796709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to file a rule 3.800(a) motion that complies with the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998) (3.800 motion must affirmatively allege that the court records demonstrate on their face entitlement to relief), and Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(allegations required by Mancino at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates an entitlement to relief).

POLEN, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
720 So. 2d 319, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14691, 1998 WL 796709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lonergan-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.