Lone Tree Resources & Consulting, Inc. AND Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini v. Persepolis, Inc., Frankford Gateway LLC, Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini, Ali A. Iranzad & Athena Labelle, AND Farzin Asfshar

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 30, 2021
Docket02-21-00246-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lone Tree Resources & Consulting, Inc. AND Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini v. Persepolis, Inc., Frankford Gateway LLC, Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini, Ali A. Iranzad & Athena Labelle, AND Farzin Asfshar (Lone Tree Resources & Consulting, Inc. AND Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini v. Persepolis, Inc., Frankford Gateway LLC, Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini, Ali A. Iranzad & Athena Labelle, AND Farzin Asfshar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lone Tree Resources & Consulting, Inc. AND Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini v. Persepolis, Inc., Frankford Gateway LLC, Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini, Ali A. Iranzad & Athena Labelle, AND Farzin Asfshar, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00246-CV ___________________________

LONE TREE RESOURCES & CONSULTING, INC., Appellant

V.

PERSEPOLIS, INC., FRANKFORD GATEWAY LLC, MOHAMAD ‘MO’ REZA KAEINI, DANIELA KAEINI, ALI A. IRANZAD & ATHENA LABELLE, Appellees

AND

MOHAMAD ‘MO’ REZA KAEINI AND DANIELA KAEINI, Appellants

FARZIN ASFSHAR, Appellee On Appeal from the 367th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-9283-367

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Dismissal of Appeal.” It is the court’s

opinion that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part; therefore, we

set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand this case

to the trial court to render judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388

(Tex. 1995). Because we cannot both set aside the trial court’s judgment and dismiss

the appeal, we deny the motion as to the parties’ request that we dismiss the appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(d), (f); Lantana Ridge Prop. Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. SJWTX, Inc.,

No. 03-19-00303-CV, 2021 WL 904865, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 10, 2021, no

pet.) (mem. op. on reh’g).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 30, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Innovative Office System, Inc. v. Johnson
911 S.W.2d 387 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lone Tree Resources & Consulting, Inc. AND Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini v. Persepolis, Inc., Frankford Gateway LLC, Mohamad 'Mo' Reza Kaeini, Daniela Kaeini, Ali A. Iranzad & Athena Labelle, AND Farzin Asfshar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lone-tree-resources-consulting-inc-and-mohamad-mo-reza-kaeini-texapp-2021.