Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 14, 2020
Docket19-2152
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology Corporation (Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2020).

Opinion

Case: 19-2152 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 05/14/2020

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

LONE STAR SILICON INNOVATIONS, LLC, Appellant

v.

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION DELAWARE, Appellees ______________________

2019-2152 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018- 00063. ______________________

Before CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. CHEN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Nanya Technology Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation Delaware, and Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A. (collectively, Nanya) petitioned for inter partes re- view of claims 1, 3, 4, 11, 13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,097,061 (the ’061 patent) owned by Lone Star Silicon In- novations, LLC (Lone Star). In its Final Written Decision, Case: 19-2152 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 05/14/2020

the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) held that all the challenged claims are unpatentable under both Nanya’s and Lone Star’s proposed claim constructions for the phrase “a channel region formed in the semiconductor sub- strate.” Nanya Tech. Corp. v. Lone Star Silicon Innova- tions LLC, No. IPR2018-00063 (P.T.A.B. May 15, 2019). Lone Star appeals the Board’s decision. In a decision issued today in an appeal from a separate IPR on the same patent, we affirmed the Board’s decision holding claims 1, 3–6, 11, and 13–16 of the ’061 patent un- patentable. Lone Star Silicon Innovations LLC v. Iancu, No. 19-1556, — F. App’x — (Fed. Cir. May 14, 2020). Thus, this appeal is moot in light of that decision. Cisco Sys., Inc. v. TQ Delta, LLC, 928 F.3d 1359, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2019).

IT IS ORDERED THAT: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as moot in light of our affirmance in Lone Star Silicon Innovations LLC v. Iancu, No. 19-1556, — F. App’x — (Fed. Cir. May 14, 2020), which invalidated all of the claims at issue in this appeal.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

May 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Tq Delta, LLC
928 F.3d 1359 (Federal Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lone-star-silicon-innovations-v-nanya-technology-corporation-cafc-2020.