Lone Star Gas Company, a Division of Enserch Corporation v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Carole Keeton Rylander, Barry Williamson, Charles R. Mathews, City of Dallas, and Dallas Independent School District

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 20, 1996
Docket03-96-00282-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lone Star Gas Company, a Division of Enserch Corporation v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Carole Keeton Rylander, Barry Williamson, Charles R. Mathews, City of Dallas, and Dallas Independent School District (Lone Star Gas Company, a Division of Enserch Corporation v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Carole Keeton Rylander, Barry Williamson, Charles R. Mathews, City of Dallas, and Dallas Independent School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lone Star Gas Company, a Division of Enserch Corporation v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Carole Keeton Rylander, Barry Williamson, Charles R. Mathews, City of Dallas, and Dallas Independent School District, (Tex. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

CV6-282

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-96-00282-CV



Lone Star Gas Company, A Division of Enserch Corporation, Appellant



v.



Railroad Commission of Texas, Carole Keeton Rylander, Barry Williamson, Charles R. Mathews, City of Dallas, and Dallas Independent School District, Appellees



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 96-04353, HONORABLE JOSEPH H. HART, JUDGE PRESIDING



PER CURIAM



This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial-court order denying a temporary injunction to prevent the Railroad Commission of Texas from proceeding with its Gas Utilities Docket No. 8623. By its "Unopposed Motion to Dismiss as Moot," appellant has informed this Court that the parties have now settled their dispute. The Railroad Commission has dismissed Docket 8623, the subject of the request for temporary and permanent injunction and declaratory relief. Accordingly, the cause is moot. When a cause becomes moot on appeal, the appellate court must set aside all orders relating to the temporary injunction and dismiss the cause. Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991); Christie v. Argonaut Ins. Co., 530 S.W.2d 334, 336 (Tex. Civ. App.--Austin 1975, no writ).

Appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal and cause as moot. We grant appellant's motion. We dismiss the appeal, our cause number 03-96-00282, and the underlying cause, trial court cause number 96-04353.



Before Justices Powers, Jones and Kidd

Appeal and Cause Dismissed as Moot on Appellant's Unopposed Motion

Filed: November 20, 1996

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, P.A.
802 S.W.2d 235 (Texas Supreme Court, 1991)
Christie v. Argonaut Insurance Companies
530 S.W.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lone Star Gas Company, a Division of Enserch Corporation v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Carole Keeton Rylander, Barry Williamson, Charles R. Mathews, City of Dallas, and Dallas Independent School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lone-star-gas-company-a-division-of-enserch-corporation-v-railroad-texapp-1996.