Lone Star Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Lone Star Co. v. United States

31 Cust. Ct. 286, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1125

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 5, 1953

DocketNo. 57598; protest 175022-K (Galveston)

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Cust. Ct. 286 (Lone Star Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lone Star Co. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 286, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1125 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found (“1 case short landed”), were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as not found, i. e., “1 case short landed.” The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found (“1 case short landed”), were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as not found, i. e., “1 case short landed.” The protest was sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Cust. Ct. 286, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lone-star-co-v-united-states-cusc-1953.