Londraville v. Londraville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Londraville v. Londraville

275 A.D.2d 988, 715 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 988 (Londraville v. Londraville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Londraville v. Londraville, 275 A.D.2d 988, 715 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court (Schwerzmann, J.). The record, viewed in its totality, establishes that respondent received meaningful representation (see, Matter of Dingman v Purdy, 221 AD2d 817, 818). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Schwerzmann, J. — Custody.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court (Schwerzmann, J.). The record, viewed in its totality, establishes that respondent received meaningful representation (see, Matter of Dingman v Purdy, 221 AD2d 817, 818). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Schwerzmann, J. — Custody.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 988, 715 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/londraville-v-londraville-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack