London v. State Ex Rel. Borom

Supreme Court of Alabama

London v. State Ex Rel. Borom

106 So. 912, 214 Ala. 698

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in London v. State Ex Rel. Borom. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 Ala. 673 →

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 12, 1925·No. 4 Div. 237.·Published

Opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; W. L. Parks, Judge.

ANDERSON, C. J.

The note of testimony in this cause does not contain or refer to the state’s evidence, but only the witnesses of the appellant, and we must treat this as the only evidence considered by the trial court, and upon a consideration of same, and it alone, we are of the opinion that the same did not warrant a condemnation of the appellant’s ear, and the de *699 cree of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; W. L. Parks, Judge.

ANDERSON, C. J.

The note of testimony in this cause does not contain or refer to the state’s evidence, but only the witnesses of the appellant, and we must treat this as the only evidence considered by the trial court, and upon a consideration of same, and it alone, we are of the opinion that the same did not warrant a condemnation of the appellant’s ear, and the de *699 cree of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

London v. State Ex Rel. Borom, 106 So. 912, 214 Ala. 698 (Ala. 1925).

Pincite

106 So. 912 (London v. State Ex Rel. Borom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.