London v. State Ex Rel. Borom

Supreme Court of Alabama

London v. State Ex Rel. Borom

106 So. 912, 214 Ala. 698

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 12, 1925

Docket4 Div. 237.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 912 (London v. State Ex Rel. Borom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

London v. State Ex Rel. Borom, 106 So. 912, 214 Ala. 698 (Ala. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; W. L. Parks, Judge.

ANDERSON, C. J.

The note of testimony in this cause does not contain or refer to the state’s evidence, but only the witnesses of the appellant, and we must treat this as the only evidence considered by the trial court, and upon a consideration of same, and it alone, we are of the opinion that the same did not warrant a condemnation of the appellant’s ear, and the de *699 cree of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; W. L. Parks, Judge.

ANDERSON, C. J.

The note of testimony in this cause does not contain or refer to the state’s evidence, but only the witnesses of the appellant, and we must treat this as the only evidence considered by the trial court, and upon a consideration of same, and it alone, we are of the opinion that the same did not warrant a condemnation of the appellant’s ear, and the de *699 cree of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 912, 214 Ala. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/london-v-state-ex-rel-borom-ala-1925.