London v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

London v. Moore

34 A.D.2d 688, 311 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5012

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 688 (London v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

London v. Moore, 34 A.D.2d 688, 311 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

— In consolidated actions to recover damages for injury to person and property, and for loss of services, etc., defendant in Action Ho. 2 (who is one of the plaintiffs in Action Ho. 1) appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 24, 1969, which, inter alia, granted the renewed motion of plaintiffs in Action Ho. 2, to remove the actions from Civil Court of the City of Hew York, Queens County, to the Supreme Court, Queens County, and to amend their bill of particulars and the ad damnum clause of their complaint. Order reversed, without costs, and renewed motion denied. The motion papers are deficient in that they do not contain a proper showing by a doctor’s affidavit of a consistent course of treatment for the accident-caused injuries as required by our decision, dated April 14, 1969, which reversed a prior order granting a motion identical to the one herein without prejudice to renewal upon sufficient motion papers (London v. Moore, 32 A D 2d 543). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In consolidated actions to recover damages for injury to person and property, and for loss of services, etc., defendant in Action Ho. 2 (who is one of the plaintiffs in Action Ho. 1) appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 24, 1969, which, inter alia, granted the renewed motion of plaintiffs in Action Ho. 2, to remove the actions from Civil Court of the City of Hew York, Queens County, to the Supreme Court, Queens County, and to amend their bill of particulars and the ad damnum clause of their complaint. Order reversed, without costs, and renewed motion denied. The motion papers are deficient in that they do not contain a proper showing by a doctor’s affidavit of a consistent course of treatment for the accident-caused injuries as required by our decision, dated April 14, 1969, which reversed a prior order granting a motion identical to the one herein without prejudice to renewal upon sufficient motion papers (London v. Moore, 32 A D 2d 543). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 688, 311 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/london-v-moore-nyappdiv-1970.