London v. London
This text of 200 N.E.2d 259 (London v. London) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decrees affirmed with costs of appeal. Mabel A. London brought a petition for separate support against her husband alleging cruel and abusive treatment and desertion and that she was living apart from him for justifiable cause. He brought a libel for divorce against her alleging cruel and abusive treatment. He appealed from Probate Court decrees allowing her petition and dismissing his libel. The evidence is reported but there is no report of material facts. There was no error. On a review of the evidence the findings imported by the decrees cannot be said to be plainly wrong. Carmichael v. Carmichael, 324 Mass. 118, 119. Duarte v. Duarte, ante, 778. Counsel fees are to be awarded the wife in the discretion of the Probate Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 N.E.2d 259, 347 Mass. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/london-v-london-mass-1964.