London Thomas v. the Place at Oak Hills
This text of London Thomas v. the Place at Oak Hills (London Thomas v. the Place at Oak Hills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00905-CV
London THOMAS, Appellant
v.
THE PLACE AT OAK HILLS, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023CV04877 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 14, 2024
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
In this appeal from a forcible detainer judgment, the justice court found that London
Thomas had forcibly detained the plaintiff’s property. Thomas appealed to the county court; it
also found she had forcibly detained the property. Thomas filed a notice of appeal in this court,
and her brief was due on January 2, 2024.
After no brief or motion for extension of time to file the brief was received, on January 5,
2024, we ordered Thomas to show cause in writing not later than January 16, 2024, why this appeal
should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). In our order, we 04-23-00905-CV
warned Thomas that if she failed to show cause in writing as ordered, this appeal would be
dismissed without further notice.
To date, Thomas has not filed a response to our January 5, 2024 order. Accordingly, we
dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
London Thomas v. the Place at Oak Hills, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/london-thomas-v-the-place-at-oak-hills-texapp-2024.