London & Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce

Supreme Court of Florida

London & Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce

144 So. 880, 107 Fla. 343

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 3, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub-' mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised o'f its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that .there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub-' mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised o'f its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that .there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Brown, J., dissents.

London & Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce, 144 So. 880, 107 Fla. 343 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

144 So. 880 (London & Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.