London & Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce

Supreme Court of Florida

London & Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce

117 So. 891, 96 Fla. 374

DecidedAugust 1, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 891 (London & Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

London & Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce, 117 So. 891, 96 Fla. 374 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel' for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, Mr. Chief Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict and that the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed while Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby reversed and the cause remanded .for a new trial.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J., J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel' for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, Mr. Chief Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict and that the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed while Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby reversed and the cause remanded .for a new trial.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J., J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 So. 891, 96 Fla. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/london-scottish-assurance-corp-v-dolce-fla-1928.