London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Ogelsby

80 A. 57, 231 Pa. 186, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 813
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 10, 1911·No. Appeal, No. 175·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The majority of the court is of opinion that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned president judge of the common pleas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Ogelsby, 80 A. 57, 231 Pa. 186, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 813 (Pa. 1911).

80 A. 57 (London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Ogelsby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rieger v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
215 S.W. 920 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1919)