London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis
263 A.D. 865, 32 N.Y.S.2d 793, 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 693, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7091
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 30, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The injunction is upheld because Special Term was justified in finding that the sole objective of defendants’ picketing was to coerce plaintiffs into interfering in the matter of a dispute between Florsheim Stores and a C. I. O. union. This made the defendants’ objective unlawful and the dispute one other than a labor dispute. Orders unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis, 263 A.D. 865, 32 N.Y.S.2d 793, 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 693, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
263 A.D. 865 (London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
M & H Fruit & Vegetable Corp. v. John Doe
80 Misc. 2d 1012 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)