Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis

London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis

263 A.D. 865, 32 N.Y.S.2d 793, 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 693, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7091
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 A.D. 865 (London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis, 263 A.D. 865, 32 N.Y.S.2d 793, 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 693, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

The injunction is upheld because Special Term was justified in finding that the sole objective of defendants’ picketing was to coerce plaintiffs into interfering in the matter of a dispute between Florsheim Stores and a C. I. O. union. This made the defendants’ objective unlawful and the dispute one other than a labor dispute. Orders unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M & H Fruit & Vegetable Corp. v. John Doe
80 Misc. 2d 1012 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 865, 32 N.Y.S.2d 793, 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 693, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/london-character-shoe-corp-v-davis-nyappdiv-1942.