Londell Watkins v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections

803 F.2d 714, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31742, 1986 WL 17860
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 7, 1986
Docket86-6624
StatusUnpublished

This text of 803 F.2d 714 (Londell Watkins v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Londell Watkins v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, 803 F.2d 714, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31742, 1986 WL 17860 (4th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

803 F.2d 714
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Londell Watkins, Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.

No. 86-6624.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 16, 1986.
Decided Oct. 7, 1986.

Before RUSSELL, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

(Londell Watkins, Appellant Pro Se.)

PER CURIAM:

Londell Watkins appeals from the district court's dismissal of his complaint without prejudice for failure to pay a partial filing fee. The district court directed Watkins to pay a partial fee in the amount of $20.25, which equaled fifteen percent of the amount deposited to Watkins' inmate account over the preceding six months. The district court's order advised Watkins that he could explain to the court the existence of any special circumstances which might justify a further reduction in the filing fee. When Watkins failed to pay the partial filing fee or respond to the court's order within the allotted time, the district court dismissed his complaint without prejudice.

The procedures followed by the district court fully complied with those approved by this Court in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982). Finding no error in the district court's action, we deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
803 F.2d 714, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31742, 1986 WL 17860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/londell-watkins-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-departm-ca4-1986.